Attenborough alarmed as children are left flummoxed by test on the natural world
By Sarah Cassidy, Education CorrespondentFriday, 1 August 2008
Children have lost touch with the natural world and are unable to identify common animals and plants, according to a survey.
Half of youngsters aged nine to 11 were unable to identify a daddy-long-legs, oak tree, blue tit or bluebell, in the poll by BBC Wildlife Magazine. The study also found that playing in the countryside was children's least popular way of spending their spare time, and that they would rather see friends or play on their computer than go for a walk or play outdoors.
The survey asked 700 children to identify pictured flora and fauna. Just over half could name bluebells, 54 per cent knew what blue tits were and 45 per cent could identify an oak. Less than two-thirds (62 per cent) identified frogs and 12 per cent knew what a primrose was.
Children performed better at identifying robins (95 per cent) and badgers, correctly labelled by nine out of 10.
Sir David Attenborough warned that children who lack any understanding of the natural world would not grow into adults who cared about the environment. "The wild world is becoming so remote to children that they miss out," he said, "and an interest in the natural world doesn't grow as it should. Nobody is going protect the natural world unless they understand it."
Fergus Collins, of BBC Wildlife Magazine, said the results "reinforce the idea that many children don't spend enough time playing in the green outdoors and enjoying wildlife – something older generations might have taken for granted".
A surprisingly large number of children incorrectly identified the bluebells as lavender, and the deer was commonly misidentified as an antelope.
The newt, recognised by 42 per cent, was mistaken for a lizard while the primrose was thought to be a dandelion.
Experts blamed the widening gulf between children and nature on over-protective parents and the hostility to children among some conservationists, who fear that they will damage the environment. They said that this lack of exposure to outdoor play in natural environments was vital for children's social and emotional development.
Dr Martin Maudsley, play development officer for Playwork Partnerships, at the University of Gloucestershire, said that adults had become too protective of wild places: "Environmental sensitivities should not be prioritised over children."
He said: "Play is the primary mechanism through which children engage and connect with the world, and natural environments are particularly attractive, inspiring and satisfying for kids. Something magical occurs when children and wild spaces mix."
Friday, August 1, 2008
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Yeah, I see this almost every day. Kids show up and have no clue how to work a fishin' pole. It's no wonder, because 90% of the boats I see out on the water are full of adults, but no kids. The kids are only on board when there's water skiing or tubing going on. Otherwise, most of 'em would rather stay home with their Playstation than go fishin'..... "It's booooooring!!!"
We went camping a few years back. My daughter and I made cobbler in our dutch oven, and made way too much. We took it to the campsite next to ours to see if the neighbors wanted to try any. The 12 year old grandson was sitting near the fire with a towel over his head because the fire was making too much glare for him to see his portable DVD player. It took about everything I had to keep from yanking the towel off his head and smacking him with it.
When my daughter was 6 her Grandpa asked her to stand under a pine tree so he could take her picture. She looked right at him and explained that the tree was a Douglas Fir not a pine. And explained the difference to him.
That's sad, but there are just as many, or more adults that are just as bad. Kids learn from their parents.
Post a Comment